Effects of Federal Funding to States

Effects of federal official bread and butter to secernatesFederal Funding to the States and Local Governments Effect on the get together StatesTaylor, Public Finance plumeWhen inquirying I focused mainly on the diametrical ways study official documentation affected the political science as a whole. I looked at how it affected political sciences on the internal, solid ground, and local anaesthetic anesthetic levels. Then I established my research question is federal livelihood good for the fall in States? While researching this I found out there be two main sides to federal reinforcement, the advocates and the critics, and that each has its own valid head ups and reasons for go for or non supporting this idea. I found the current issue debt, several court lessons involving the US governing body infringing upon the rights of its citizens, and the four different pillowcases of admits the federal governing uses in its large-minded of property and resources. Bas ed upon the information I gathered conducting my research it is unaccented that federal funding from the national governing to the articulates and local governments can be detrimental to the health of this farming.Keywords federal funds, grants, national debtFederal Funding to State and Local GovernmentsFederal Funding in the USA rising trend has been developing in the modern government freshly. Federal funding to become up programs and governments has been steadily increasing over the past days. According to Elmendorf (2013) health grants to the states and local governments study increased from around 50 billion dollars in 1980 to about 300 billion dollars in the course of instruction 2010. This occurrence is decent much and much common as state governments seek more and more federal specie. These free recourses come in four different forms categorical grants, block grants, formula grants, project grants according to Ferguson (2013). Categorical grants are grants t hat still aloneow funding to be used for specialized, narrowly delimit purposes. Block grants allow much more freedom in designate the funds and are widely sought after. Formula grants are allocated ground upon a set of pre-existing criteria and often serve a adopt group of lot. Project grants fund specific projects or the delivery of specific services. These four types of grants make up the majority of federal funding. These grants may stick out essential funding for state and local governments, but they come with umteen critics who question the repercussions of national government funding and the states reliance on these funds.In Support of more Federal FundingIn times of crisis, a common theme comes to light autocratic rule. For instance, in ancient times, whenever the city of Rome was threatened or being besieged, their Senate would elect one soulfulness to rule above them and lead citys government and defenses. They did this because although the people would lose th eir voice in the government, the benefits outweighed these side effects. When one person is in charge, hallows are give and adjudicated upon much more strongly than when given by a group of people. The same concept goes hand in hand with a sizable National Government. whizz muscular organization body can control and be more businesslike than 50 different independent state governing bodies with one slightly defective national government. It is simple mathematics. If I tell someone to go set out me vanilla ice cream it takes all of ten seconds for me to convey this order and for them to get in their car. However, if I am in a fashion filled with ten people we then bemuse to discuss and weigh over several different issues before we can ever decide on one specific path. We subscribe to figure out what type of ice cream we want, who is driving, and where we should get the ice cream and these are unspoiled a few of the many choices we must make. This could take ten minu tes opposed to the ten seconds. The difference in time could prove costly to a president when he must make a quick and decisive decision.concessions and loans are similar in the aspect that they both match funds from outside sources to increase funding for a project or issue. However, the similarities stop there and the main attraction to grants arise. One who receives a grant does not normally check to be fall the money accepted (Repay a Grant Overpayment, 2014). This allows state and local governments to not only receive free resources from the federal government, but to also redistribute the resources that were dear saved to early(a) issues. This greatly overhauls the state or local government because now two different issues or organizations are funded opposed to sound one.In Favor of Less Government FundingWhen this country was founded our forefathers feared big government. Big government is the idea of the federal government being in any case authorityful and, due to this, unfairly ruling and controlling its people. To secure this didnt happen our Founding Fathers in like mannerk great lengths to limit the power of the national government. They created state and local governments, and also granted them powers that the national government is unable to impinge upon. They even set specific limitations to the power of the federal government in the 10th Amendment of the Bill of Rights which states The powers not delegated to the joined States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people (Tenth Amendment, 2014). This means that any powers not specifically given to the federal governments are automatically reserved for the states or to the people. All of this was done to examine that the national government cannot become too powerful and override or control the states. However, as state and local governments receive increasing amounts of federal funding they begin to rely on t he federal government more and more. As their reliance upon federal money increases so too does their dependence on the federal government. This inadvertently gives the national government more and more power while taking extraneous the states power. As the national government gains influence the states slowly lose the index to keep an eye on the national government and perform their use of goods and services as a watchdog.There are several instances in United States history when the federal government tried to overstep its bounds and engross state or personal rights. One such instance is be in the court case Windsor v. United States. In this court case the United States Government contravened upon our personal rights and tried to discriminate against married sapphic and gay couples for the purposes of determining federal benefits and protections. Thankfully the U.S. Supreme Court command against the federal government and decided that section three of the Defense of hymene als Act was unconstitutional (Windsor v. United States, 2012). This court case is one of many where the government had to be reined in after infringing upon our constitutional rights. Unfortunately, not all instances of encroachment by the federal government was righted by the Supreme Court. One such instance is the court case United States v. Bhagat Singh Thind. Due to the actions and decisions of the United States Government the doors of U.S. citizenship would close to all Asian immigrants for the next 23 forms after it was decided that South Asians would not be able to be considered citizens from 1923 to 1946 (United States v. Bhagat Singh Thind, 2013)A major concern for the United States economy is our growing national debt. As the years progress the U.S. owes other countries more and more money as we are forced to borrow money from them to keep from defaulting on our payments and keep our country rill. The U.S. debt is currently around 18 trillion and is judge to be around 1 8.7 trillion by the end of the fiscal year of 2015. This is roughly three times higher than the national debt in the year 2000 (Total US Government Debt in 2015, 2014). At this rate our country give be in so much debt in the near upcoming that the damage will be irreparable. Also, all it would take to send the government spiraling down would be one these foreign countries to call in on our debt. The government currently does not have the money to repay these debts, therefore America would be forced to default on these payments. To help prevent this from happening a state government could simply renounce to accept as much money from the national government. This would give the Federal Government more resources to pay its debt and take care of its own using up issues.Assessment of the ArgumentsFederal funding is a major aspect of our government. It helps support many different programs and projects in our state and local governments. In recent years this funding has steadily incre ased as state and local governments require more and more resources to run and operate. This increase in funding has its fair share of advocates and critics, however. The advocates point out that as the federal government provides more and more money to the states that the power of the national government increases. As the power of the national government increases the more effective the governing power of the national government becomes. This concept can be explained using a concept called soldierlike law. According to (Martial Law, 2014) martial law is when a war machine takes over a town or city due to the pretermit of ability of the residing government to perform its job. A common reason this is enacted is insubordination or revolts in the town. A to military is able to succeed when a government could not because a military can work and track down its actions much more efficiently than a government can. This is due to how the presiding ships officer can issue and execute a n order as soon as they think of it instead of having to discuss and negotiate the issue with several other groups like a government would. Another valid belief of the advocates is the position that when a state or local government receives grants from the national government then their resources have significantly increased. Now the local or state government has the funds it needs for one project in humanitarian to the funds it has in the first place. Now two projects have been funded. only put, more federal funding means a more powerful and efficient government as well as more money for the state and local governments.Wherever, you find advocates of something you are sure to find critics as well. It is no different in the case of federal funding. While the supporters converse of a powerful government and more money for local and state governments, the critics make very different but equally valid points. They point out that our founding fathers feared big government and took m any steps to ensure that the national government could not become too powerful for its citizens and infringe upon their rights. This is a strong possibility as the government becomes more powerful and is evident in several different court cases like Windsor v. United States and Bhagat Singh Thind v. United State. Another valid reason critics dislike federal funding is how the more money the national government gives to the states the less money it has for itself. With a quickly growing national debt the main concern of the government should be paying off what it owes, not giving money that it doesnt have to other organizations.Conclusion and Personal BeliefAs I have said earlier, there are many people who believe federal funding should increase and many people who say it should not. They both bring up very strong points as well. However, no matter how efficient and well-run the federal government might become as they gain more and more power, it does not offset the possibility of th e average citizen being unmarked or ruled unfairly. This was the biggest fear our founding fathers faced and they went to great lengths to ensure that our government does not become omnipotent. So why should we go against everything they stood for? each(prenominal) citizen is supposed to have a say in their government and the running of it. This is the entire idea of a democracy. Once people start losing this power or this power begins to be overlooked, then we will no protracted have a democracy. In addition to this issue, we have a looming national debt that is quickly growing each year. Yes, it is nice for our state and local governments to have a little bit more money to spend on its residents, but should not we be more concerned with keeping our government from having to owe trillions of dollars to foreign governments like China? I personally would much rather go without the new state park than constantly use up about the day that a foreign country demands we pay them toos hie all we owe plus interest. Federal funds may have their pluses and attractions, but they are not worth risking our rights as civilians and the economy of our country for them.ReferencesChantrill, C. (2014, July 1). Debt Clock. Retrieved November 16, 2014, fromhttp//www.usgovernmentdebt.us/DeHaven, T. (2013, June 25). How Much Does Your State Government Depend on Federal Funds. Retrieved November 1, 2014, fromhttp//townhall.com/columnists/taddehaven/2013/06/25/how-much-does-your-state-government-depend-on-federal-funds-n1626882Edwards, C. (2013, June 7). Fiscal Federalism. Retrieved October 15, 2014, fromhttp//www.downsizinggovernment.org/fiscal-federalismElmendorf, D. (2013). Federal Grants to Local and State Governments.Congress of the United States, congressional Budget Office,1-28. Retrieved November 1, 2014, fromhttp//www.cbo.gov/sites/default/files/43967_FederalGrants.pdfFour Main Types of Grant Funding. (2013, April 14). Retrieved November 15, 2014, fromhttp//www.federalfun ding.net/grants_types.htmMartial Law. (2014, February 6). Retrieved November 1, 2014, fromhttp//legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/martiallawMulhausen, D., Tyrell, P. (2013, September 11). Retrieved October 15, 2014, fromhttp//www.heritage.org/research/reports/2013/11/the-2013-index-of-dependence-on-governmentRepay a Grant Overpayment. (2012, May 27). Retrieved November 15, 2014, fromhttps//www.myeddebt.com/borrower/myoptions_repayGrants.actionTenth Amendment. (2014, January 9). Retrieved November 14, 2014, fromhttp//www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/tenth_amendmentU.S. v Bhagat Signh Thind. (2008, November 2). Retrieved November 15, 2014, fromhttp//www.bhagatsinghthind.com/court.phpWindsor v. United States Edie Windsor Challenges DOMA Decided. (2009, April 18). Retrieved November 14, 2014, fromhttps//www.aclu.org/lgbt-rights/windsor-v-united-states-thea-edie-doma