Disaster Paper Essay

When you deliberate on a fortuity, it becomes clear that any such(prenominal) event has three descriptors to it. Initially, thither argon antecedents that lead to the hap. When enough antecedents take aim accumulated, the contingency occurs at that specific tipping time. Finally after the mishap has happened the final examination phase of resolutions occurs. The resolutions are steps that the society attempt to implement to lapse the effects that the event has produced. Consider the Deepwater view disaster that happened on July seventeenth 2010. Upon critical review the crowd assimilate identified series of antecedents that light-emitting diode to the disaster.At the tipping point the disaster occurred, lives were lost and numerous crew members injured. later the initial shock of the disaster and evacuation of the crew engineers and BP staff move to shut the vigorous with numerous trials. Eventually policy makers were involved in development of the new safety policies. Numerous investigations and trials were performed to better understand the disaster and avoid alike(p) events. At the end numerous antecedents have been identified, the disaster was resolved and the events identified. The Deepwater Horizon accident was found to have multiple antecedents that caused this tragedy.Specifically, a sequence of eight safety barriers that were breached led to the explosion which killed eleven stack and caused widespread pollution throughout the Gulf of Mexico. At first the nimbus cement barrier was installed improperly and did not isolate the hydrocarbons coming from the nearly. The garment track barrier did not isolate the hydrocarbons. As a consequence these two events allowed hydrocarbons to rise up the tumesce and aboard the Deepwater Horizon rig. The shun pressure test was incorrectly interpreted. The influx of hydrocarbons was not recognized until it was excessively late.Well control response actions failed to regain the control of the well . This led the well flow to be entertained to the mud gas separator do gas to be vented onto the vessel rather than being diverted over board. Safety fire and gas systems did not prevent hydrocarbon sack from the engine room. Finally, the blowout preventer (BOP) emergency modes did not seal the well due(p) to the accumulation of previous seven events mentioned above. With these eight events leading one to another, it was a good deal more difficult to seize the explosions and fire that damaged the MUX cables and hydraulic lines.This resulted in failure of the emergency disconnect system. To conclude, it is clear that specific and identifiable antecedents puke be discovered and that their accumulations to a tipping point lead to the disaster. The second phase of the Deepwater Horizon disaster deals with engineers and BP technical staff trying to close the well so that the oil colour spill is stopped. To reduce the oil spill the leaking oil is set on fire with the hope that the spill volition be reduced. On May 2nd, 2010 PB starts to drill a relief well that should overtake that leaking site.On May 5th one of the leaking sites is capped, however oil continues to leak from the well. On May 7th BP engineers use the containment chambers to close the remaining leaks. The idea fails and is abandoned. On May 9th a junk hypothesis approach is use, the following day top hat approach is aforethought(ip) out. The attempt to reduce the leak continues, numerous other approaches and plans are implemented to either reduce the oil spill or completely hold in it. On august 4th BP key outs that using the latest attempt the inactive kill appears to be successful and attempts to permanently seal the leak are in the process.On September 19th the Deepwater Horizon leak have been permanently sealed. The nightmare that happened on May 2nd has been halted but not fully resolved. The environmental affect that the disaster caused volition hunt the forthcoming of Gulf of Me xico waters for decades. For example, seahorse populations in the region decline and the genus Hippocampus zosterae, dwarf specie of seahorses, is on the verge of extinction. The role of engineers in the Deepwater Horizon disaster is immense. During the accumulation of antecedents there are evidences that engineers knew about chaos that was occurring on the Deepwater Horizon rig.However, due to poor management and lack of communication in the midst of companies involved in the project, engineers had little impact in correcting the antecedents. Eventually, when the disaster occurred, the BP engineers time-tested various attempts and ideas to close the opened well. Lastly environmental engineers are and will be involved in cleaning efforts of the Gulf of Mexico waters. Therefore it is historic to consider the engineers as not only the antecedents in a disaster but also as proactive members of society that attempt amends the environment to pre-disaster state.Therefore, engineering is involved with all disaster phases. As a class, we plan to incorporate each disaster phase into the final report and discuss how engineering process have been aiding the future avoidance of similar disasters. It is important to understand that media reports cover just a few aspects of disasters and newsworthiness in ordinary. In many cases the scope of media reports is within political and sparing spectrums. Therefore further research into documents released by various commissions and investigators that are publically available will be looked at and analysed by the group and its members.The group process is moving according to the milestones developed and outlined in the project paper. Despite this, new opportunities in scheduling allows for the group to have a few extra meetings and perhaps finish the final report forrard of the scheduled time. The comparison chart of milestones is outlined below. Over all there are a few challenges that the group have to work through. As mentioned above the group plans to analyze some reports developed by the investigators of the disaster. The repugn part is to read through pages of technical analysis and to identify link up parts for the assignment.Since there are new group meetings, it should be realistic to accomplish this task in professional manner. In addition the group will do a presentation on the project and so these two meeting dates will be allocated towards that time. The final paper will contain a more detailed and chronological outline of the disaster phases. The paper will discuss the causes, antecedents and policy developments that occurred as of the result of the disaster. The general breakdown of the parts has not changed since they were assigned during the composition of the proposal paper.