'Analysis of “Mr Sookhoo” and “A Cat Within”\r'

'M bingley has been, end-to-end the history of humanity, an end and an aim for human action. In their pursuit of bills, tidy sum have followed different paths; round honourable, legitimate and legal and others devoid of legality, honour and legitimacy. Indeed, in the short story collection Stories from Around the world complied by Hilary Patel, many stories examine the impact of bills and financial considerations on the decisions that many characters make. In â€Å"Mr Sookhoo”, the eponymous character is immediately identified to the averer as someone whose sole concern in action is the accumulation of wealth and riches.\r\nMr Sookhoo, sitting on his porch and chew at a tooth pick discloses an ingenious thought to his help little wife: he informs her that he aims to deploy religion as a tool for qualifi shake offion easy money. Mr Sookhoos plan is simple; knowing that ghostlike people give generously around the zippy season especi completelyy when presented with a group of innocent(p) carol singers raising money for charity, he find outs to get an institute for the guile, deaf and dim and to use local school children to achieve his selfish money-making aims. Sookhoo shows total rationalise to morality putting his personal financial increase at the top of his priorities.\r\nAlso you can read Analysis July at the Multiplex\r\nWhen Mr Sookhoos plan starts salaried dividends in the form of sincere fetchings on the very first day of his carol interpret project, he immediately resolves to work his young assistants (who be not, of course, aware of his malicious intentions) longer hours gift them dwarfish rest. Moreover, when Mr Archibald, the Headmaster of the local school attended by the carol singers, suggests treating the children to ice-cream, Mr Sookhoo chooses to ignore the suggestion buying the children plainly a carbonated drink that clearly cost less than the ice-cream.\r\nIt is clear here that Sookhoo is oblivious to anyt hing tho his obsession with making easy money. In Christianity, Sookhoo is blamable of the sin of avarice or greed which is one of the seven deadly sins that signal total press release of faith. In the story, Mr Sookhoo is not a Christian entirely pretends to be one convincing Mr Archibald that he had â€Å"seen the well-off” in hallow to gain his approval for send children with him on the carol singing mission.\r\nMr Sookhoos avarice take aims to his eventual(prenominal) downfall when he is found out and captured at the end of the story. Sookhoos avarice happens to a snowballing of unfortunate occurrences that discomfit the money-making plan that seemed to be going too well. solely at once many characters appear in the story pushing, as it were, one more nail down into Sookhoos coffin. First, Mr Ali, who had previously paid Sookhoo to deliver some annoy for him, appears and exposes Sookhoos failure to keep his end of the bargain.\r\nIn addition, Mr Archibald, who started harbouring doubts virtually Mr Sookhoo when the latters account of the carol singing successes did not ensure to what Mr Archibald was told by a young pupil called Horace, receives a visitor by the name of Mr Harris (who is a palpable philanthropist working in the charity field) who confirms to him that the deaf, dumb and blind institute does not exist. These revelations and findings raise stress in the story and drive the plotline towards its climax when Mr Sookhoos cheat of money brings about his downfall and arrest.\r\nRead alike Analysis of Characters in Flannery O’Connor’s â€Å"The smell You Save May Be Your Own”\r\nAt the end of the story, poetic justice is upheld as the assaulter and wrong doer is punished while the good are rewarded. â€Å"Mr Sookhoo” ends on the note that a blind love of money can hardly lead to negative consequences. The price that Sookhoo pays for being a striver to money and materialistic gain is no less tha n his freedom. Mr Sookhoos metaphorical slavery (signaled by his servitude to anything that can lead to making money) at the beginning of the story becomes the ca-ca of his physical incarceration, which is a form a slavery, at the end.\r\nAlthough in the case of Mr Sookhoo, poetic justice is upheld as good is rewarded and evil is punished, the so-called â€Å"cliff-hanger” finis of â€Å"A Cat Within” where the reader is left to decide whether justice leave behind be at all served, contrasts to the message of â€Å"Mr Sookhoo. ” In â€Å"A Cat Within,” where the symbolism of the cat acts as a varan of a dark secret that comes back to haunt the un-named â€Å"Shopman” in the story, the love of money seems to have caused a series of crimes much weightier than those committed by Mr Sookhoo, simply in that respect is no indication that these crimes will be punished.\r\nIn fact, one possible interpretation for the blurred ending of the story is that the exorcisers own love of money will prompt him to eternally work the Shopman in order to keep his crimes safely tucked away and isolated like the cats betoken stuck in the metal urn. â€Å"A Cat Within” ends with the Exorcist withdrawing into his room but reminding the Shopman that he will request his pay later. This reminder could be read as a top threat and a prelude to a life-long blackmail project the Exorcist hopes to embark on. In â€Å"A Cat Within,” both the Shopman and the Exorcist display their organic attachment to money.\r\nOn the one hand, the Shopman keeps his tenants in horrible living conditions and sacrifices his own comfort by dormancy in the doorway to stop intruders from coming into his house. On the other hand, the Exorcist makes his living by giving the false impression that he is curing people from obsessions by demons and other supernatural evil beings. When the Exorcist is called upon to help with the assumed â€Å"evil spiritâ₠¬Â wreaking carnage in the shop store, his world that places money at the top of the consideration list and the world of the Shopman, where money occupies the same place, meet.\r\nRead also Case 302 July in Multiplex\r\nThe Exorcist being adept at reading people like a book, manages to chew over accurately about the Shopman and the way he came to pull in his wealth. It transpires that the Shopman killed a man and his widow before taking their land and money. However, unlike Mr Sookhoo, the Shopman remains free at the end with the cat, a symbol of his dark secret, roaming in the streets with a jug on its head. The symbolism of the cat slipping out of the store but with its head still caught inside the jug suggests that the Shopmans secret is only half revealed.\r\n'