Fingerprint Scanners Concern Privacy Watchdog - Case Study

Question: Discuss about the Fingerprint Scanners Concern Privacy Watchdog. Answer: Introduction Ethics is defined as the fundamental principles and the basic concept of the decent human contact (Tannsjo, 2013). This also includes the study of universal values like natural and human rights, essential equality of all women and men, obedience to land law, concern for safety and health and for natural environment. Therefore, it can be said that ethics is an essential factor in every aspect of life including leadership, business, employee ethics and many more. However, every incident can be explained by implementing the different types of classical ethical theories. There are mainly three types of ethical theories that are generally implemented to explain or analyze a particular incident. These are Consequentialist Theories, Deontological Theories and Virtue Theories. In this essay, a particular article named Fingerprint Scanners Concern Privacy Watchdog has been discussed and analyzed from the perspective of two alternative classical ethical theories for better understanding of t he theories of the ethics. Analysis of Ethical Theories The article Fingerprint Scanners Concern Privacy Watchdog has been taken from the news.com.au site. This article is about the increased use of the fingerprint scanning technology in both the clubs and pubs that might potentially breach the privacy of the customers of the clubs and pubs and might also pose major risks regarding security. This issue or problem statement can be explained or analyzed through implementation of various classical ethical theories (Singer, 2011). The particular problem statement can be analyzed as per the concept of the theories - Consequentialist Theories and Deontological Theories. The reason behind this is that both these theories of ethics are contradictory to each other and it can also be said that Deontological Theory is the most important alternative theory to Consequentialist Theories. The Consequentialist Theories are mainly based on two principles, these are firstly, an act is whether right or wrong it depends on the result of the act. And secondl y, the better consequences an act produces, more right that particular act is. The particular theory provides guidance during the period of moral dilemma. This guides an individual to select that particular action, which maximizes the good consequences and the Consequentialist Theories also provide general guidance as per which an individual should live. As per the Consequentialist Theories, people should live in order to increase the good consequences (MacCannell, 2011). The Consequentialist Theories are also mainly composed of two states depending on the different types of consequentialism that differs based on the item on which the goodness of a thing should be exploited (Meylan, 2013). These states of Consequentialist Theories are utilitarianism and hedonism. Just consequentialism is a system that is applied for development of ethics that combines the both consequentialism and core values. In the mentioned article, the ethics can be explained through the Consequentialist Theorie s. As per the article, fourteen major venues within the country Australia involving the Amplifier nightclub in Perth and the Coogee Bay Hotel in Sydney started using biometric technology system in order to control the violence related to the alcohol (News.com.au, 2016). This system of biometric technology is supplied by NightKey to the major venues for the well fare of the common people and also to protect the common people from alcohol related violence. The other systems like to record the fingerprint, photo and some types of identity card like driver license are also been implemented within some of the major venues in order to create a computer profile for every individual who enters the venue (Hawthorne, 2014). The main aims of implementing these systems by the management of the major venues are to provide safety and protection to the common people, to reduce or to avoid or to control any alcohol related violence within the venue. It can also be said that if a patron is ejected o r banned from the venue then his profile is ensign and therefore he cannot gain re-entry in the particular venue in future (Haukur Ingi Jo nasson. Ingason, 2013). As these steps and systems have been implemented for the betterment and well fare of the people, this can be said that Consequentialist Theories of ethics can explain and analyze the particular problem statement and that is for the aim of protecting and avoiding the alcohol related violence, the management of the major venues takes all the personal details of the people that is not supported by most of the customers. On the other hand, the Deontological Theories are the normative ethical position, which judges the morality of a particular action on the basis of the adherence of the action to the rule of rules (Baggini, 2012). The Deontological Theories maintain the statements about which one cannot explain the term of statements regarding the badness and goodness of the consequences. Thus, from the perspective of the D eontological Theories this particular article can be explained and analyzed. It can be explained in this way if any criminal enters the major venue or any police case takes place then for investigation the management department of the venues can provide the entire data, photo, ID proof and fingerprint of the visitors to the police department for proper investigation (Anderson, 2011). Therefore, it can be said that the Deontological Theories are also applicable in this particular article as for the safety and well fare of all the common people or visitors of the pub or nightclub, the management is making the system riskier for the criminals. Thus, the particular concept of Deontological is implemented here as for the betterment of most of the visitors and people, the process is taking steps to catch the criminal. Conclusion Thus, it can be concluded that every action or incident can be explained or analyzed based on the various theories of ethics. Thus, the particular article Fingerprint Scanners Concern Privacy Watchdog can also be explained though both the Consequentialist Theories and Deontological Theories. From the perspective of the Consequentialist Theories, it can be said that the systems implemented by the management of the major venue is for the welfare of every individual who are visiting to the pubs. On the other hand, from the perspective of the Deontological Theories, the management of major venues implemented the new systems of photo, ID and fingerprint in order to identify any criminal who enters the venue. References Anderson, R. (2011).Ethics. London: Hodder Education. Baggini, J. (2012).Ethics. London: Quercus. Haukur Ingi Jo nasson., Ingason, H. (2013).Project ethics. Farnham, Surrey, England: Gower. Hawthorne, J. (2014).Ethics. Malden, MA: Wiley. MacCannell, D. (2011).The ethics of sightseeing. Berkeley, Calif.: University of California Press. Meylan, A. (2013).Foundations of an ethics of belief. Frankfurt: Ontos Verlag. News.com.au. (2016).News.com.au. Retrieved 27 May 2016, from https://www.news.com.au/ Singer, P. (2011).Practical ethics. New York: Cambridge University Press. Tannsjo, T. (2013).Understanding ethics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.