Employee Mentoring Essay

Jankowicz (2005) mentions, that methodology is the affect or advance to undertake a look into or analyse. previous to follow a methodology, it is essential to understand the research philosophy, which according to Grinnell (1993 cited Kumar, 1999, p. 6) research is a structured inquiry that utilizes acceptable scientific methodology to crystallize riddles and creates new knowledge that is generally applicable. When researching it could be apply to either situation, either for professional or personal occasion.In this case, the main purpose of doing research is to develop an investigation most real situations that may join on or change the knowledge of a particular management problem (Ghauri and Gronhaug, 2002). at that placefore, the diverse research methods will be discussed in this chapter, which among early(a) strategies it involves appealingness and analysis of the research data (Blaxter et al, 2001 Collis and Hussey, 2003).Research Philosophy The understanding of philosophical positioning of research is useful in the way that helps research workers to clarify pick designs and methods for a particular investigation and post which are more in all likelihood to work in practice (Ghauri et al, 1995). In this case, research philosophy is about the way the researcher perceives the development of the knowledge and the way the information grassnister be acquire through different processes, besides it provides an ideology to utter out the research (Collis and Hussey, 2003 Saunders et al, 2003 Bryman, 2004).Therefore, there are two main views associate to research philosophies positivism and phenomenological, which is also kn admit as interpretivism progression (Denscombe, 2002 Collis and Hussey, 2003 Saunders et al, 2003 Jankowicz, 2005). Saunders et al. (2003) visor out that the phenomenological burn up proposes the discovery of subjective meanings in for example serviceman behavior in order to understand and give interpretations to t heir actions and reactions to particular situations (Collis and Hussey, 2003 Saunders et al. , 2003).Nevertheless, it is classical to have in mind that one is not a best philosophy than the another(prenominal). The philosophy sees on the research question that the researcher is want to answer (Saunders et al, 2003, p. 85). From the above mentioned, the research philosophy of this study is based on the develop of skills and knowledge without aiming to generalized and want for the truth, but to centralize on understanding of human behavior based on the descriptions and experiences of people in particular proposition situations (Collis and Hussey, 2003 Saunders et al. 2003 Jankowicz, 2005).Hence, this research will take an interpretivism philosophy, because the study is related with employee mentoring and attitudes towards line of descent satisfaction and organizational commitment. The role of cordial learning processes and characteristics of a hot mentor may have a great in fluence on the above mentioned attitudes of employees, which is based on different meanings and interpretations that individuals could have on their own experiences. In addition, Collis and Hussey (2003, p. 7) said it is an approach which assumes that the social world is constantly changing, and the researcher and the research itself are part of this change.Not only the social world is changing, but also the global business environment is and utilize an interpretivism approach provides flexibility to confront those changes. Whereas the positivistic approach is characterized by seeking law-like results that can be generalized and there is an objective truth that come through in the world and can be revealed through the scientific method, where the focus is on measuring kinds, systematically and statistically, between variables.Research Approach fit to Saunders et al (2003), a research is conducted to analyze breathing theories, or to urinate new theories as a result of recent f indings. This will depend on whether the approach is deductive or inductive. A deductive approach is where the researcher develops a theory which will be tested, whereas an inductive approach is where the theory will be developed from the analysis of the data that is overtaking to be collect.The nature of this research is not to find a specific theory but an explanation of an existing situation, for example, in todays global business environment. Therefore, this research will place the inductive approach which is closely related with the interpretivism philosophy imputable to its characteristic of not assuming results that are inferred from general conjectures, but developing an explanation from the data collected where general conjectures are induced from specific cases (Jankowikz, 2000 Collis and Hussey, 2003 Saunders et al. , 2003).Research Purpose An great part of a research and mainly seeing it from the perspective of its objectives, is to distinguish the purpose of it , which according to some authors can be classified as exploratory, descriptive, explanatory and predictive (Kumar, 1999 Saunders et al. , 2000 Collis and Hussey, 2003). Whereas, the exploratory study is carried out to explore areas, identify variable and look for hypothesis instead of confirming hypothesis, the predictive study forecasts the result of an event and anticipate the outcomes of that event which is under study.On the other hand, an explanatory (analytical) study focuses on studying a situation or a problem in order to discover and measure the relationship between variables, while a descriptive study identifies, describes and provides information of a particular issue (Kumar, 1999 Saunders et al. , 2000 Collis and Hussey, 2003). Therefore, the purpose of this research, taking into account its objectives is exploratory due to the fact that it tries to examine the impact of employee mentoring on their attitudes towards job satisfaction and organizational commitment.The rol e of social learning processes is also very important in the relationship between mentoring and job attitudes. The qualities of a mentor also campaign a great role in this relationship. Hence, it would lead to find strategic recommendations for the organization involve in this investigation. Data Collection To answer the research question and achieve the objectives of the research there is the need to collect data, (Saunders et al. , 2000). There are two main data resources, secondary and primary data. alternate data is the one that already exists from previous investigations and it can be tack together in books, journals and films (Saunders at al, 2003). Primary data is the one that is recollected from the research and it can be obtained by using methods such as questionnaires, interviews, focus group, and other (Collis and Hussey, 2003). Saunders et al. (2003) points out that literature review helps to develop an understanding and insight into pertinent previous research.Collis and Hussey (2003), add to Saunderss point of view saying that exploring the existing literature will help to have a better overview on previous research that has been conducted and its impact on the studied research problem. In addition, Saunders et al (2003) classify the secondary data into three types documentary, survey-based and multi-source. For this investigation, it will be useful the documentary secondary data because written documents such as articles taken from the Internet, journals, books among others, could be relevant information to be used.